> If, for example, the person was a stakeholder in a competitive company and documented that they were trying to hurt the company, then it obviously wouldn’t be an honest opinion.
An engineer at Ford could say that they think the new Silverado is a POS. It could be their honest opinion AND could be said for the purposes of damaging Chevy. Someone can be biased and still honest.
Even if you found evidence they made the opposite claim in another forum, they can still argue that their honest opinion changed over time.
An engineer at Ford could say that they think the new Silverado is a POS. It could be their honest opinion AND could be said for the purposes of damaging Chevy. Someone can be biased and still honest.
Even if you found evidence they made the opposite claim in another forum, they can still argue that their honest opinion changed over time.