Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So DR had a dumb policy and were not great negotiators. Gates knew exactly what had fallen into his lap.


No, not really.

At the time, IBM made very expensive mainframes and minicomputers, plus all the associated paraphernalia: terminals, printers, storage.

It didn't make microcomputers. It didn't really sell to the general public. It sold smaller kit to big businesses, and the bigger kit even they couldn't buy: you could only lease it.

Microcomputers were only just beginning to be a product sold to the public for home use. Up until the first few complete, integrated systems in around 1976-1977 (in the USA, the Apple ][, Commodore PET, and original TRS-80), microcomputers had been expensive modular devices, used in business.

That's the market DR sold to, and utterly dominated: relatively price S100-bus small business micros.

DR was not _a_ big player in microcomputer OSes, it was _the_ big player. Almost the only player: I can't think of any other cross-platform microcomputer OS available in the 1970s.

The PC was a highly atypical product for IBM, made from COTS parts, intended to be sold to the public, direct to end-users. It's not really something anyone expected IBM to do, and in this position, it was a company nervously trying to get into a totally new market for them, approaching the industry giant with caps in hands.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: