> most preventive care is already fully covered at no cost to the patient.
Sigh. Someone has to pay and that someone is all of us.
Health insurance plays on the fallacy most individuals have that they will somehow beat the system and receive more services than they pay for.
So, it becomes a race to use as much as possible. Over prescribed meds for the sexy new illness you think you might have after seeing that commercial, unnecessary office visits, bloated testing.
Combine that with Drs who are scared shitless of being sued so they do whatever the patient wants, you have a the reasons for what we have today which is extreme over use of medical services. And that is precisely why insurance and care is so expensive.
I don't totally disagree with your broader point, but there's a decent case to be made that basic preventative care reduces costs by catching issues before they become expensive, chronic conditions (or worse.) The 'preventative care' that is 'free' is usually pretty basic: yearly physical, scheduled vaccines, and basic blood tests and cancer screenings at certain ages.
I'd also question what health insurance plans still encourage 'using as much as possible'. Most are high-deductible plans, where you are paying $100-$150 for an office visit until you hit your deductible or OOP max. The days of $20 copay doctor visits are gone for most of us, unless you are on Congress' health plan.
I don't agree that this is "precisely" why insurance and care is so expensive. Other countries do this just fine. The main reason that it's so expensive in the US is because we have for-profit insurance companies whos interests are diametrically opposed to the interests of the patient. They want to make as much money as possible, and patients want to pay as little as possible.
I have also been there and tried that, extensively. That's the opposite experience of what I encountered in paying by cash for more than a decade. Typically I'd pay around half price via cash for healthcare services (routine doctor visits, scans, et al.) versus what they charged if you had insurance. I never ran into a situation where they wouldn't negotiate steep discounts for paying by cash.
I can never get them to tell me what it would cost if insurance were to cover it. Either pay a definitive amount of cash today, or insurance will cover some unknown arbitrary portion of a similarly arbitray and unknown amount tomorrow, and pay the difference.
Yes, it works for routine stuff, but don't try to pay cash for abdominal surgery. You will get a very terrible, high price. After all, it's agree to our low price or die of appendicitis.
Not really. Its a matter of knowing where to find the place that can treat you.
For example, this surgery clinic will treat your appendicitis for less than the average patient's deductible + coinsurance. I'm including the flight + hotel stay in that estimate.
The problem is how you go about finding this information. Most ASC's and even independent doctors are extremely obtuse precisely to hide this huge liability from you. Hospitals will treat you like you are joking. Most hospital billing staff will prefer to do a cartwheel for you, instead of quoting you a price (insured or not). Or they will give you the super helpful range of 1,000 to...100k. Yes,I'm exaggerating to make the point. Heck, even if 1 out of 3 facilities do give you the estimate you seek, that's still 1 hour of time wasted for every 3 calls (avg call hold+time = 30mins) made.
For this reason, I recommend you go with a facility that is part of https://fmma.org/
Disclaimer: I don't have any relationship with OK Surgery or FMMA. Only a big fan, and also working with my startup to take out insurance out of regular healthcare choices.
1000 to 100k? How about zero to infinity? Hospital refuses to give any price range for a colonoscopy, wouldn't quote a cash price because I had insurance. Insurance can't say if it is covered. Won't know until the claim is submitted. Says it might be fully covered as preventative care, or partially covered, or not covered at all. Might not even go against the out of pocket max. Spent a week on the phone trying to get a straight answer. Final bill 3k.
"Its a matter of knowing where to find the place that can treat you." This is fine if you can plan in advance and have the funds to travel, but what if you can't? What if you're in a car accident, or have a heart attack? You can't shop around when your guts are spilling out on the asphalt.
> this surgery clinic will treat your appendicitis for less than the average patient's deductible + coinsurance. I'm including the flight + hotel stay in that estimate.
Are there really people flying to avoid overpaying for an appendectomy?
Boy, I had to have an appendectomy and I could barely stand. I can’t imagine flying for one, or holding off to get everything arranged. I suppose I may have had less time to plan than is implied here: went to bed fine, woke up in agony.
That has not been my experience in both Nevada and Arizona. I have paid cash for two child births, one was an emergency C-section, the other was planned. I was told costs up front and paid cash. I paid cash for a septoplasty and two tonsillectomies, all well under what I would have paid if I had self pay insurance..
This is provider-specific. Medical tourism exists, both internationally and within the USA. Some providers are happy to accept immediate cash and forego the pain of dealing with insurance company bureaucracy and delayed reimbursement.
Sorry, low effort post on my part: This is silly, so now we are expected to negotiate and haggle medical costs like we do at a car dealership? No thank you. Rather we all pay the same price, and if we have insurance, charge the insurance more.
I just wanted to clarify what OP meant by $Maximum. I'm not sure if that was intentional use of maximum or not, but it's pretty accurate and I'll explain why.
A couple of terms I need to define up front:
Provider = Anyone or anything rendering healthcare services.
Payor = We'll just define this as a health insurance company.
Charge Amount = This is the "sticker" price, many of you have heard of it. This is something defined by the provider, essentially all providers maintain a chargemaster which is a list of all services (procedure codes) and their respective charge amount (more on this later). Almost always they just have one chargemaster.
Allowed Amount = This is the negotiated price for a service between a provider and a payor.
So, say I'm getting a knee replacement at Man's 4th Best Hospital. The knee replacement is procedure code 27445. The hospital looks at their chargemaster and the charge amount is $10,000. If you want to self pay, they will often offer you a discount based on the charge amount. Often times around 80%, but it's very variable. Many people ask "well what would it be if I used my insurance so I can compare price". To which you get response of "we don't know, or we don't share that info, etc". Almost always they honestly don't know and it's actually really really hard for them to find out. I can talk about why this is so hard if there's interest.
Anyway, back to the example. A common myth is that the charge amount is just a made up number. This isn't really true, it is based on something. In virtually every contract there is a clause the insurance company puts in that says "we (the insurer) will pay the lessor of the charge amount and allowed amount". In other words if the allowed amount is less than the charge amount then the insurer pays the allowed amount, if the charge amount is less than the allowed amount then the insurer pays the charge amount.
So, we get our knee replacement at Man's 4th Best Hospital, the billing department submits a claim for procedure code 27445 and includes the charge amount of $10,000 on the claim. They send it off to Man's 4th Best Insurance Company. Side note, the claim would be much more complicated than this. Also happy to explain more about why that is if there is interest.
Now say the Hospital and the Insurance Company had negotiated an allowed amount of $5,000 for this procedure code. This means that Insurance Company will pay the Hospital $5,000. What if the billing department submitted the same claim with a charge amount of $4,000. Well then the Insurance Company would only pay them $4,000, it doesn't matter that they had in fact negotiated a higher rate of $5,000. So you can see how the burden is on the provider to ensure they submit the claim with a charge amount that is greater than the negotiated allowed amount otherwise they will get underpaid.
Alright, now back to OPs use of the word "$Maximum" for self pay. Remember how I said providers maintain one chargemaster. Because providers have many many contracts with many different payors, and across all these contracts the allowed amount can vary quite a bit, they need to set their charge amount as the highest allowed amount across all their negotiated contracts. If not they will sometimes get underpaid when submitting a claim. This is in large part what the charge amount is based on. It is the highest allowed amount across all their contracts with payors.
You may be thinking, hold up I thought you said they don't know what their negotiated allowed amounts are so how do they know how to set their charge amount at the highest allowed amount across all contracts. One way they can figure out the charge amount is by looking at how historical claims were paid out.
Okay okay sure, makes sense I guess, but why don't they just set the charge amount as $1,000,000 for everything. They could maybe, perhaps there's some rule against this, but regardless it wouldn't be very helpful. The chargemaster is a useful negotiating tool as it tells you your highest negotiated rate for a given procedure code. It's also useful for forecasting your financials. For example, you can look at last years claims for a given payor mix, and determine what percent of your chargemaster they paid out. Then you can use that to forecast revenue for next year. This is a really dumbed down example but I hope you get the idea.
So long story short you now understand the "why" behind the self pay cash price being a discount on their highest negotiated allowed amount, aka $Maximum as OP put it. That doesn't mean you're getting price gouged necessarily. Their chargemaster charge amount may be less than medicare rates if they have bad contracts (little negotiating power), or it could be super high if they have good contracts (lots of negotiating power).
My background is in the healthcare tech world on "both sides" (for providers and payors) for about 5 years doing analytics/data science/engineering stuff. I just mention this because as a long time lurker of hackernews anytime I see big healthcare threads like this I see a lot of questionable information that at least in my experience isn't accurate. There are some high ranked threads in this post that are not accurate in my opinion.
So all this to say, I empathize with OP's "/been there //tried that", it's a very frustrating experience. If there's one thing I've learned in my short time in the weeds of the US healthcare system, it's that the overwhelming majority of clinicians are honestly trying their best and are just as frustrated as patients (sometimes for different reasons but a lot of times the same reasons). The most exploitive behaviors are taking place multiple levels beyond the clinician you see at the clinic and are acting like puppeteers, where the puppets are clinicians and patients. The puppet strings are so long and so tangled that we can't even really tell what's causing all our anguish, so we just get upset at the only thing we can see.
You could but without insurance, you are taking a big risk. The point is that I cannot just buy insurance that covers catastrophic stuff. It is binary. Either I buy insurance (crazy premiums) and then I might as well use it everywhere or I don't. If I don't buy insurance, good luck.
The point is that Insurance should be offered for catastrophic issues with caps and out of pocket limits and premiums should be much lower because the insurance should not cover basic stuff and for those, we should use cash thereby have price transparency AND market competition b/w various providers.
If you have a medical plan subject to the Affordable Care Act then most preventive care is already fully covered at no cost to the patient.
https://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/preventive-care-benefits...