Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

At least in English you can structure sentences to be pronoun agnostic, as long as you have some way to refer to the users


I'm not sure why using 'them' is any worse. It's a nice identity-agnostic pronoun. Mixing pronouns with names is much more natural than repeatedly using the name. I don't get why it's an issue at all.


I'm saying that if you don't know a person's pronouns at all and you're not sure if they/them sounds right, you largely can avoid it altogether. And I don't mean by just repeating their name over and over (which I agree sounds weird), so if we take the original comment:

> Feel like it would be easier if he rewrote it from scratch and then copied the business logic

then using their name is totally pronoun agnostic as discussed:

> Feel like it would be easier if foone rewrote it from scratch and then copied the business logic

but you can also not use name, pronoun or anything:

> Feel like it would be easier to rewrite the app from scratch and then copy the business logic

or:

> Feel like it would be easier if the app was rewritten from scratch, and then the business logic could be copied

English is really flexible, and to be honest I think these look quite natural and don't sound like I'm nervously trying to avoid offending anyone.


Fair point. I'll try to do that as much as I can.


I guess because "they" and "them" is plural, and it can confuse people to think that you're talking about a group of people instead of a single person? At least that's what confuses me (as non-native speaker) quite often when I read someone talking about "them"


Singular "they" predates singular "you" [1]. If someone tells you otherwise, tell them they are wrong. That use of "them" as in the previous sentence has been correct for centuries.

[1] https://public.oed.com/blog/a-brief-history-of-singular-they...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: