That's a very human centric way of framing the issue.
There is no environment that need saving. Carbon emissions are merely changing the environment in a way that may not be convenient for a lot of humans.
You're just saving the status quo of human society, not "reinvesting in the Earth".
If by environment you mean species of animals you should worry more about plastic and trash than carbon emissions.
But, like, I’m a human? Morals are a human thing (or a mammalian thing maybe), heck written WORDS are definitely a human centric thing. How could I not be human centric?
There is no environment that need saving. Carbon emissions are merely changing the environment in a way that may not be convenient for a lot of humans.
You're just saving the status quo of human society, not "reinvesting in the Earth".
If by environment you mean species of animals you should worry more about plastic and trash than carbon emissions.