It'd have to be demonstrated. There's always places to hide in generalities.
Every word can be quibbled over as not actually applying and thus sitting outside the definition.
It's a prohibition against a generally described feature which makes it fundamentally contestable.
And say you nab them. Then they just have to do an otherwise meaningless permutation to the feature and claim they're compliant and you're back in court.
Every word can be quibbled over as not actually applying and thus sitting outside the definition.
It's a prohibition against a generally described feature which makes it fundamentally contestable.
And say you nab them. Then they just have to do an otherwise meaningless permutation to the feature and claim they're compliant and you're back in court.
Ianal btw