Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why is SQL Server able to backup and restore databases 100s of gigabytes in size in single-digit minutes, while Postgres is at least 10x slower?



Is that even true? I don't think I've seen or read a direct apples-to-apples comparison of the two.

There could be all kinds of reasons why that is tho (if it is in fact the case).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: