Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The practical disk usage difference between pnp and pnpm appears to be almost entirely accounted for by the fact that pnp zips almost all packages. Both store ~1 version of each package-version on disk; it's just that one's zipped and one's not. The mapping entries for package edges in both cases (.pnp.cjs for pnp and the symlink farms for pnpm) are very small in comparison.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: