I don't see your train of thought here, you first mention the lack of
"experimentally realizable predictions", i.e. not falsifiable, and then gives one of the many examples that string theory solved without being able to experimentally verified.
Why would that give you a pause? How this single example is different from all other "predictions" from string theory?
Why would that give you a pause? How this single example is different from all other "predictions" from string theory?