This is another myth that needs to die. I'll give three examples:
1. NATO bombing of Kosovo;
2. NATO invasion of Libya; and
3. NATO has strategic nuclear weapons.
Even if you ignore those real examples of aggression, from an adversary's perspective, the only difference between NATO being "defensive" and "aggressive" is a policy change or even just stretching the definition of "defensive" to include preemptive military action in other countries.
This is another myth that needs to die. I'll give three examples:
1. NATO bombing of Kosovo;
2. NATO invasion of Libya; and
3. NATO has strategic nuclear weapons.
Even if you ignore those real examples of aggression, from an adversary's perspective, the only difference between NATO being "defensive" and "aggressive" is a policy change or even just stretching the definition of "defensive" to include preemptive military action in other countries.