Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Civil "in rem" forfeiture says that the asset is a guilty party to the crime. It applies to any asset that is involved in any crime.

I see it often in cars taken and sold from people with traffic violations.



That's the problem. Assets can't commit a crime. They aren't people, or even corporations. Yes, maybe a court will determine after conviction that $XX is ill-gotten gains and require the convicted defendant to turn over that money. But stealing before a conviction just on a whim? This has got to stop.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: