Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's highly regulated because the airlines like it that way. For example, the whole "only the person named on the ticket may fly on it and you can't sell it to someone else yourself". That came in after 9/11 because the airlines loved that they could charge fees and not allow people to sell their tickets.

The stated "requirement" was so that they could know who was travelling, but for international travel, that's covered by your passport, and for local travel, by your local ID (driver license etc). Having your "name" on your ticket is just bullshit.

As for the "security sensitive" it's actually "security theatre" that has been in place since 9/11.

Excusing the behavior of the airline is ridiculous. They didn't need to drag this person off the plane, they needed to offer enough to the passengers until enough had accepted their offer so that they could deadhead their staff. That is what is supposed to happen when they need to offload passengers.

Don't excuse their behavior.




I'm not talking about how regulations happened; only that they increase the tension in the environment and procedures involved.

I'm not talking about how effective the security practices are; only that they exist and result in much faster and more forceful action.

I didn't excuse their behavior; I agree that it was poorly chosen and should be criticized.

What I'm explaining is that they can lawfully (at that time ) cancel a ticket and remove a passenger at their will; regardless of how they were chosen or whether it was a good idea. What happened after is a series of escalations that is standard procedure with countless other examples where force was proportional and effective without ending in a scandal.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: