Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The plane is private property if the company tells you to get off, you have to get off and settle it in court later, there is nothing else you can reasonably do. I do hope he got a nice settlement out of the overreaction, though. However, if you're in my house, my private residence, and I tell you to GTFO out then you have to comply, it's the law, just like on the planes.



A more accurate analogy would be if someone sold me a ticket to swim in their pool, then as soon as I show up and start swimming in their pool (having already paid for the ticket to swim), they say "actually my brother wants to swim" and call the cops when I don't want to leave because I haven't got the swim I paid for yet.

Except that's still not a good analogy because that involves the personal property of a discrete individual, not the somewhat public service vehicle of a faceless corporation. We shouldn't allow corporations to run roughshod over the little man. Just because civil suits exist as a potential route for renumeration doesn't mean we should allow this behavior from airlines in the first place.


That situation would end with the cops asking you to leave when asked to do so, and suggesting you pursue civil action to get your ticket money back.

The trespassing is in their jurisdiction to enforce, as it is a crime. Being shorted on a ticket is not in their power to address.

It is bad when you get stuffed by a corporation, but it’s no excuse to break other laws.


I don’t think it’s that simple though. Airlines are almost a public conveyance; they sold him a ticket and he would have gone to some lengths based on that reasonable expectation. People coming to your house don’t have that expectation.


Yeah the analogies aren't useful. The actual laws about air travel are though. Airlines can legally bump you from a flight. There are laws about what kind of compensation you are due if this happens.

https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/aviation-consumer...

That said, the rule seems to be that once you've boarded, they need specific reasons (behavior, safety, etc.) to remove you from the flight. In this instance, it sounds as if the airline fucked up.


It is that simple. You do not have the right to fly on a private service.

Especially if you have wilfully ignored the terms of service and caused disruption to other passengers.


Actually, you do have a right to fly on a private service once they've let you board. This wasn't the case yet in 2017, but the TICKETS Act clearly states:

> if the gate agent accepts a passenger for boarding after collecting or scanning the passenger’s boarding pass, the carrier is prohibited from removing the passenger from the flight thereafter.


> and caused disruption to other passengers.

That is precisely what United did.


You most definitely do have the right to fly on a private service... if they voluntarily offered you a ticket, you accepted the offer, paid them, and were even allowed aboard to boot.

If United rented out their house to two tenants, they can't just drag one of them out by the ears? It's on them for being two-timing fraudsters.


A paying tenant in your house has the right to stay even if you demand him gone. Same with a paying passenger.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: