Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We know for a fact that FB leadership regularly discussed ripping off smaller companies business ideas (ie, Snapchat [0]. Not a sign of moral people.

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/08/17/theftovation-facebook-...



Ripping off business ideas is an aspect of competition (BK versus McDonalds), not sure it is related to morals…


Oh come on. There's a limit to being pedantic


Strictly speaking, there isn't.


Sorry, what?

If I share an mp3 the record industry demands ridiculous compensation.

If I steal a paragraph in a college exam and get caught, I'm sent home without credit or refund.

If I sell a drawing of a certain cartoon mouse, or draw a red shirt on Pooh, I can literally go to jail.

... But if I invest my life savings to start a company based on an insightful idea and read of the market, a trillion dollar company can rip me off wholesale and people will call it "business" and "not related to morals"?

Please tell me that sounds as batshit insane to you as it does to me.


> If I share an mp3 the record industry demands ridiculous compensation.

If you look at the success of Britney Spears and spawn an entire market of popstar clones, though, that's entirely legal.

That's essentially what Facebook did to Snapchat.


Usually general business models are not protected as intellectual property in the same way as bit-for-bit copies in the case of mp3s/writings. I’m not saying it should be.

The bigger issue that you are pointing to is that the tech companies are becoming large trusts that do everything and can leverage their size to win everywhere. E.g. see Amazon competing with Intel now.

The anti-trust movement needs to be stronger if society says: ‘wait, this isn’t a good idea to let one company win at everything’




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: