Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How about if instead of a machine gun it just explodes when it gets close? Looks like we're back to missiles.


Yes, but then it's not cheap anymore.


Are guns cheaper than explosives?


No, guns are more expensive, but they are reusable. You can fire north of 10000 rounds with a gun. The individual rounds are very cheap in the dollar range.

A drone that carries and explosive and meets another drone and blows up is quite an expensive solution. You'd prefer a gun any day.


Seems like then you're at cross purposes where you want an expensive gun on an inexpensive, vulnerable/disposable vehicle.


Guns are nowhere near as expensive as fixed wing drones. Here, for a sense of scale are some costs:

- bullet: cents

- Kalashnikov rifle: hundreds of dollars

- 500 pound unguided gravity bomb: a few thousand dollars

- 50 cal machine gun: 20k dollars

- 500 pound guided gravity bomb: 40k dollars

- Cessna 172 civilian plane: 400k dollars

- AIM-9X air-to-air missile: 400k dollars

- Houthi Samad drone: unknown, but probably hundreds of thousands of dollars

- Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone: depending on client and delivery package, between $1 million and $5 million

- Tomahawk missile: $9 million (wikipedia says $2 mil, but that's out of date; the latest DoD budget [1] shows the Pentagon will buy 60 Tomahawks in 2022 for $551 MM, see page 23)

[1] https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudg...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: