Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

If you failed to restart the engine and intended to glide some distance it might make sense to stop windmilling the prop since it generates a lot of drag. But it seems to be theatrics here.



That's a fixed-pitch prop, which will generate more drag stopped than windmilling.


This is not true for any plane I've flown -- see discussion at https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/64394/does-a-wi..., although it does seem like there's some variability.

Especially if the engine is still making compression, a windmilling prop is extracting at least enough energy from the free stream to keep not just the prop but the engine turning... this is a lot!


I agree that energy lost to turning the engine must come from the airstream, don't underestimate how much energy can be lost just to creating turbulence in the airstream - after all, that's why you drop like a rock if you do a slip with full flaps. And a stalled windmilling prop will generate less turbulence than a stalled stopped prop.

The discussion at your link makes a good point though - the windmilling prop might not be stalled while a stopped prop certainly is stalled, and a stalled prop obviously creates less drag.


It is surprising that there's no good data on it. Someone with a scientific mindset in a remote location who's good at restarting a stopped engine in flight should run a couple of tests.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: