Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

ESR's proposal here is basically just another way of spelling Python list comprehensions or Perl 5 map (which is likewise a builtin, with special parsing rules). It's not "new PL territory" by any means.


I think the "new PL territory" was referring to a type-safe generic map builtin. Obviously Python and Perl don't have a concept of type safety. That said, I still wouldn't call that novel in the sense that a builtin version of a well-understood generic function doesn't seem like a feat of ingenuity.


Most statically typed languages have a type safe generic map or it can be easily built.

Just like with monomorphisation, Go just stubbornly rejects all PL research younger than 40.


> Most statically typed languages have a type safe generic map or it can be easily built.

That's my point.

> Just like with monomorphisation, Go just stubbornly rejects all PL research younger than 40.

That's flamebait.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: