Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

According to the linked biography¹

> The label was reportedly after control of Prince's master tapes.

Edit: I’m guessing this refers to owning the right to copy a master rather than owning the physical tapes that the master is stored on.

Relevant quote from a 1996 NY Times article on Prince²

> If you don't own your masters, your master owns you.

When Prince changed his name to a symbol, I didn’t pay too much attention to pop or mainstream music so when I heard about it, I had assumed he was simply being pretentious. After hearing about his problems with Warner Brothers, I have a lot more sympathy for his actions and desire to have creative control over his own music.

¹ https://www.angelfire.com/wv/Royalbadness/bio.html

² https://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/17/arts/a-re-inventor-of-his...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: