Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> That is completely absurd risk reward ratio to reject.

Not really. The impact of losing is "lose hundreds of thousands, be in debt for the next decade and have my work (and life in general) suffer", while still having to deal with having to then fight for access continuously.

The impact of winning was "losing hundreds of thousands, be in debt for a decade, and still have the risk of custody reversal in a future case".

The only winning move here is not to play[1] unless the odds are greatly in your favour - it's cheaper for the female so the female's impact in a win or a lose is substantially less.

Regardless of the risk/reward ratio, when 10 lawyers tell you not to bother, you'd be stupid to ignore their advice.

In any case, I still want to now where you got your statistics from.

[1] All I had to deal with after that was to enforce the contact. That took 3 court cases (luckily, all in my favour).



But women file for custody. Multiple states already have 50/50 being default custody.

Also, filing does not costs "hundreds of thousands". That is just not true. Poor people have those hearings and while it costs money, it costs significantly less.


Where are your stats from?


Where are your 10 lawyers stats from? You realize that lawyers can just be repeating the same thing they found on google? Which could simply be a quote from a forum like this one.

This discussion requires the same standards for all arguments, and no appeals to authority.


> Where are your 10 lawyers stats from?

Irrelevant - I didn't present it as stats applicable to the populate, I presented it as "10 lawyers I spoke to".

Parent presented the 50/50 statistic as a fact, I want to know where he read that.


I'd like to know too.

I also don't find your unique experience useful though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: