Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The chart on that page has always squicked me out a bit, because SHA-2 is certainly still "considered strong" by cryptography engineers.


Consider that the people working for you are experts, but the rest of the world on average is not. If one cannot make a judgement whether <https://eprint.iacr.org/2004/207> weakens SHA-2 for a particular use case or not, then it is safer to assume the worse, and simply use SHA-3 instead.


> the people working for you are experts

This is tangential, but your facts about tptacek might be a bit out of date. He's no longer at Latacora; he's now working at fly.io. So I think it's safe to say he has recent experience working with people who, while they're skilled developers, aren't security experts.


Marc Stevens who broke sha1 has said he doesn't think sha2 will get broken any time soon. See https://twitter.com/veorq/status/1128273048367398912


See, case in point. She should change the chart so SHA-2 has an all-green line. It's clearly misleading people.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: