Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My counterpoint is that for the pro market, portability and power efficiency are not always that important. Yes, for plenty of people. But many pros are sitting at a desk all day and don’t need to move their computer around.

For these users, you’re not comparing M1 max to laptop CPUs/GPUs, but to the flagship AMD/Intel CPUs. Based on early results from the M1 max on geekbench, the 11900K and 5950X are still better. And the best GPUS for pro are absolutely still significantly more powerful than M1 Max.

This makes sense, because you have to dedicate a lot of power to desktop PCs, which you just can’t do in a laptop. But I think the pro question is still often “what gives me the most performance regardless of power usage,” and the answer is still a custom built computer with the latest high-end parts from Intel/amd/Nvidia, not apple.

Obviously Apple is basically offering the best performance hands down in a portable form factor. But Apple also isn’t releasing parts like the 3090 which draws like 400W, so it’s not yet competing for super high end performance.

Point being, I think Intel and AMD aren’t really left in the dust yet.



True, but there are plenty of pros that need mobility (eg: photographers, musicians, designers, etc).

Also there are many pros (most?) that do not have super high performance requirements and would rather use a laptop they can also use for casual use.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: