Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I doubt they are going to make different chips for prosumer devices. They are going to spread out the M1 pro/max upgrade to the rest of the lineup at some point during the next year, so they can claim "full transition" through their quoted 2 years.

The wildcard is the actual mac pro. I suspect we aren't going to hear about mac pro until next Sept/Oct events, and super unclear what direction they are going to go. Maybe allowing config of multiple M1 max SOCs somehow working together. Seems complicated.



On reflection I think they've decided that their pro users want 'more GPU not more CPU' - they could easily have added a couple more CPU cores but it obviously wasn't a priority.

Agreed that it's hard to see how designing a CPU just for the Mac Pro would make any kind of economic sense but equally struggling to see what else they can do!


There is only so much you can do improving the CPU.

On the other hand, we still haven't really reached the limit for GPUs.


I suppose it’s the software - most CPU software is primarily designed to run on a single / few cores. GPU code is massively parallel by design.


I think we will see iMac Pro with incredible performance. Mac Pros, maybe in the next years to come. It's a really high end product to release new specs. Plus, in they release it with M1 Max chips, what would be the difference? a nicer case and more upgrading slot? I don't see the advantage of power. I think Mac Pros will be upgraded like in 2 years ahead


The real question for the Mac Pros is whether the GPU is changeable or not, and what that means for shared memory.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: