Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

AMD and Nvidia's encoding engines can handle more load, do it in lower latency, and also be higher quality in less bits. The last time Intel impressed me with Quicksync was in the Haswell days.



I’d far prefer to user onboard graphics, and AMD is ahead as you describe, more so than I’d appreciated. I am impressed with the UHD630, but AMD beats it easily. https://www.tomshardware.com/amp/features/amd-vs-intel-integ...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: