> Having a majority does not make an action ethical. Hence the term: tyranny of the majority.

Pricing is not "tyranny of the majority." If nobody wants to buy what you are selling, you are not being oppressed.

Given that people decided they would much rather buy the coin with the altered ledger, it is more valuable.

As a meta note: Crypto seems to bring out the most low-brow critiques on either side. Maybe because it has become popular with a mass audience?