Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There were other "special cases". Here in California and many other places in the U.S. committees were formed by non-medical people to decide who should get the vaccine first. Decisions were made not by whose more likely to catch/spread it first, but who was most worthy.

See: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/covid-vaccine-firs...

From that article:

> Harald Schmidt, an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities. “Older populations are whiter, ” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”

In fact, if there was a supply problem, the best populations to give vaccines to first may have been some of the most "privileged" people in our society (even if we don't like them). Frequent travelers, college kids who are going to party anyway, etc. (Of course, people who work in retail stores, or front like health workers were obvious groups that nobody disagreed with.)

The point is, _who_ got the vaccine first wasn't decided by science, but by politics.

I admit to fudging my eligibility in order to get the vaccine early. I may do this again to get the booster if I decide I need it.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: