Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The scientific consensus was that there was no evidence that mask would work (or not work) for 2019-nCoV. There's plenty of evidence that it helps prevent transmission of other respiratory viruses.

So which hypothesis would have most likely been true at the time? Not to mention that Dr. Fauci himself had admitted that it was a noble lie (aka pure propaganda and falsehoods).



That’s a slightly better description of what happened. And I will say it again: two wrongs don’t make a right.


Surely it would be great if you might provide a better description of the event (and the timeline, long after the outbreak in Wuhan).


Surely. But frankly I don’t feel like it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: