Again, that's a multi-mode failure. You're assuming that (1) edge cases must exist somewhere where FSD is unsafe, (2) that drivers will find them, and (3) that when they do, the existing supervised beta paradigm won't work. In isolation any of those can happen, sure. But in combination they're vanishing.
Broadly you're doing the luddite/reactionary thing and demanding perfection: as long as you can conjure a scenario in your head where something "might" happen you want to act as if it "will" and demand that we refuse to implement new solutions.
But the goal isn't perfection and never has been, for the simple reason that the existing solution also sucks really bad. Real human drivers in Mendocino with the sun in their eyes hit bikers too!
To be a bit more obvious: I am afraid. I am not telling other people to be afraid. But I am very curious about the general public's view of this technology.
Again, that's a multi-mode failure. You're assuming that (1) edge cases must exist somewhere where FSD is unsafe, (2) that drivers will find them, and (3) that when they do, the existing supervised beta paradigm won't work. In isolation any of those can happen, sure. But in combination they're vanishing.
Broadly you're doing the luddite/reactionary thing and demanding perfection: as long as you can conjure a scenario in your head where something "might" happen you want to act as if it "will" and demand that we refuse to implement new solutions.
But the goal isn't perfection and never has been, for the simple reason that the existing solution also sucks really bad. Real human drivers in Mendocino with the sun in their eyes hit bikers too!