Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think folks really do not understand the difference between Verizon calls (regulated under common carrier rules) and Facebook (a social network).

Facebook claims to be a social network. Those types of networks normally DO NOT allow you to promote other social networks.

Even review platforms which are a bit more communication in nature block posting other sites reviews.



> Facebook claims to be a social network. Those types of networks normally DO NOT allow you to promote other social networks.

I don't see how that makes it legal.

Herey other examples of potential actions that would also clearly qualify as illegal anti-competive behavior:

Microsoft could decide to block the download pages for Chrome and Firefoz from being shown in IE.

Google could block results related to Bing in their search engine or browser.

I don't see how this behavior by Facebook is any different. If it can be shown that this was done deliberately by Facebook, I have little doubt that it would also qualify as anti-competive behavior.


Microsoft does steer you away from Chrome.

When you first search on bing for chrome downloads they will put up a big edge promo above the result. After you download they will pop up a box asking if you are sure you want to switch as edge is "Faster and more secure".

The problem for mastadon is it has a TON of content that is against facebook policies. So facebook can simply say - users are reporting this crap as spam - we've blocked it. Done.


Yes Facebook is clearly closer to Walmart or McDonalds than to an internet provider. Yet section 230 applies to ISPs and FB but not to Walmart...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: