Realistically, such a new protocol will only make it worse. No doubt that new problem will lack some features that IPv6 has and that are in active use. So some group will refuse to move to the new protocol.
Some group will not move at all. IPv4 is fine for them.
And the rest of the world will get an endless amount of translation between IPv4 and the new protocol that is a nightmare to debug.
There is also the big question whether there actually exists a better transition path. I have not seen any ideas that are likely to be accepted on a large scale by the networking community.
Some group will not move at all. IPv4 is fine for them.
And the rest of the world will get an endless amount of translation between IPv4 and the new protocol that is a nightmare to debug.
There is also the big question whether there actually exists a better transition path. I have not seen any ideas that are likely to be accepted on a large scale by the networking community.