Calling isn't zero cost, and that spammer time isn't zero cost, so in this case, there is a incentive from the spammer to weed out people who costs the most.
So isn't the popular idea that you should NOT answer spam calls wrong? Logically, you should answer every spam call and try to get them to stay on the line for as long as possible, therefore maximizing their cost.
This is assuming they have some CMS software on the backend that allows them to categorize numbers.
>Logically, you should answer every spam call and try to get them to stay on the line for as long as possible, therefore maximizing their cost.
You also have to factor in your costs as well. I checked a random VOIP service and they charge a penny per minute, or $0.60 per hour. The federal minimum wage is an order of magnitude higher at $7.25/hour. Therefore it's more expensive for you to stay on the line to mess with them.
There are systems to waste telemarketer time, ex lenny troll [0] (which acts like a senile person). While I used to answer in bad faith, I stopped given the realization that I am hurting people of lower economic standing more than the company that employs them.
I kinda wish Apple would let me mark voicemail as spam. They wouldn’t even really need to do anything with that info. Just delete the voicemail and maybe keep track of the number and if I mark the same number three times then block it.
I know I can block a caller, but I don’t know enough about how these scams work to know if blocking a number slows them down at all.
I just don’t let my phone ring ever so I don’t deal with too much of the spam. Every once in a while I open the phone app and see I have like 15 new voicemails. I’m guessing I do that once a month so they are just calling every other day.