Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think it's a matter of impossibility. The current process is simply a local optimum. Most practicing software engineers can pass the trivia quiz. Most time wasters can't, unless they googled for the answer key. The result is a pool of candidates that usually can understand a real interview question an engineer will ask. The system works, at the price of being annoying.


If there's only a single correct answer that the interviewer doesn't understand and an expert might get wrong, it's people who google the answers that have the best chance of passing.

I tend to ask open-ended questions. Let them talk about code, and I can probably figure out whether they're full of shit or not. And a real coding challenge proves better whether someone can code than any code question or whiteboard challenge.


But you're an engineer, aren't you? Do you think you could figure out if someone is bsing you about their experience in mRNA manipulation?


No, but that's why you need to let people's skills be assessed by people who are able to assess those skills.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: