Many people, including myself, would be willing to make other concessions in order to keep my gas stove. Some people may not care about the difference but would prefer to keep eating a bit more red meat or something.
Maybe we shouldn't approach this with blanket bans because people have different preferences and lifestyles. A ban that is easy for one person to swallow might not be so easy for another. Perhaps we could just price stuff in, so that people can decide? Although, I suppose that would just disproportionately affect poor people..?
For any given thing that someone will be asked to give up, someone will ask if they could give up something else they care less about instead. Eventually I'm sure they'll come after something I care about as well. I think we need to be willing to embrace a carbonless future to the greatest extent that we reasonably can. The idea of pricing things in would be good in theory, as long as the money could be reliably used for capture of carbon and other pollutants.
Maybe we shouldn't approach this with blanket bans because people have different preferences and lifestyles. A ban that is easy for one person to swallow might not be so easy for another. Perhaps we could just price stuff in, so that people can decide? Although, I suppose that would just disproportionately affect poor people..?