Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don’t believe it.

Steve Wolfram should grow some balls and say he doesn’t believe it either.



I don’t think it’s a question of ‘belief’. AOC is logically independent of the other ZF axioms: you may find it aesthetically ugly (a viewpoint I’m sympathetic to). But you can’t disbelieve it any more than you can disbelieve Euclid’s parallel postulate.


But I don't have to use it, or I can deprecate it.

Particularly I think those "real" numbers are phony compared to the integers and rationals. (At least the latter have names)


Here's a professor of math in some Australian university who has pursued a philosophy of mathematics while basically rejecting infinities, axiom of choice, and reals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U75S_ZvnWNk


Interestingly politicians (like AOC) are also independent of logic.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: