Well, the entire article presumes the security audit does not have conflict of interest and Everyone here presumes its state planted and activists are falsely imprisioned.

This article is nothing but a hit piece trying to capitilize on the death news of one of the 'activist' and trying to create a sympathy wave.

I am not presuming anything. I am just giving backstory on what goes on on the ground. Anyone who claims to fight for tribals rights are either maoists or chritian missionaries.

One of the so called activist (who died last week) was a Jesuit priest.