Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Mozilla management have never been honest about their desires and motives for Firefox.

How can an organization created by venture capitalists which depends on Google for most of its income commit itself to challenging Google?



I worked at Mozilla for a long time and this interpretation is simply not true.

Servo does not, even if finished, turn into a self-supporting product. Keeping Gecko going already is a huge challenge for Mozilla.

I don't have a lot of faith in Mozilla leadership's ability to compete, but it's certainly not that they don't want to try to compete.


What is your honest opinion of the management there? And what do you make of OPs statement about reliance on funding from google?

I’m genuinely curious


Everyone has to walk on eggshells around anything that might affect the Google search deal, but that's mostly it. If anything the Google money is resented, even though it also funds everything.

IMHO leadership always lacked imagination around Firefox, and never had the fortitude to back any alternate investment enough for it to succeed.

More generally I wrote a blog post with my interpretation: https://www.ianbicking.org/blog/2020/11/firefox-was-always-e...


You're being downvoted because you're airing an uncomfortable truth. Deep down they know you are right but they don't want to admit it so they downvote you.

It's a natural human trait; I doubt Lobster is any better.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: