> I can think of 300 sites that need to be re-coded off the top of my head if this is a hard stop on it. And I don't have time for that. Nor does anyone else.
The linked email repeated a half dozen times that this would be "soft deprecation", affecting the documentation, not throwing any error in the code.
How, exactly, would that "break" any sites on the Internet?
The linked email repeated a half dozen times that this would be "soft deprecation", affecting the documentation, not throwing any error in the code.
How, exactly, would that "break" any sites on the Internet?