Its just as large and just as consequence free as bitcoin/crypto heists and fraud despite the paper trail
Some reinforce their respect of one system by looking at the proportions of the money supply and transactions, I would say that isnt that important as the industry / interest in fraud has a fixed size
ACH fraud was 1% on 21 billion$. That's 210 million in total, way less than the 4 billion from the article with 1 Bitcoin scam ( of an exchange, again).
None of the ACH frauds were the exchange/bank running away with your money fyi.
And probably a lot of them, if end users, was even insured.
Edit:
Sorry. Made a mistake corrected below by a comment and follow-up.
0,08% fraud on 51 T. Is still way less than this sole scam vs. BTC market cap.
I took the 1% from you, assuming you got it from somewhere reliable or at least that you believed in it. (I looked for it in the report summary; I didn't find it; I assumed you got it from the full report, which I don't have access to.)
If the correct figure is 0.08%, that's almost $41B on $51T (more now, as the network volume continues to grow).
Sure. Thanks for correcting me and sorry for the inconsistent number at first. It wasn't easy to find numbers since most just retold the original mentioned article without absolute numbers.
But the entire fraud /year is way less percentage then this sole scam from the entire Bitcoin market cap valued against its peak.
So his comment is actually a net positive for traditional payments ( even if you neglect insurance, ... )
FWIW, 0.08 basis points = 0.0008% = 0.000008 = 8 in a million = 8 cents in a million cents = 8 cents in 10,000$, as the article says. (0.08% would be 100x more.)
No worries. Basis points are somewhat weird if one is not used to them, and the article is a bit cheeky in that it mixes cents and dollars, making it extra confusing.
https://www.afponline.org/publications-data-tools/reports/su...
Its just as large and just as consequence free as bitcoin/crypto heists and fraud despite the paper trail
Some reinforce their respect of one system by looking at the proportions of the money supply and transactions, I would say that isnt that important as the industry / interest in fraud has a fixed size