Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Oh, I didn't know this existed. Definitely going to try this. I'm currently using Puppeteer Sharp (https://github.com/hardkoded/puppeteer-sharp) and something like:

> await page.GotoAsync("https://playwright.dev/dotnet");

> await page.ScreenshotAsync(new PageScreenshotOptions() { Path = "screenshot.png" });

Is broken, if you have background images in CSS the screenshot happens after Page Load is completed but before all CSS images are loaded so you end up not getting backgrounds in the screenshot. The only solution is to try add a delay before taking the screen grab, and it there's any sort of latency then the delay could result in not getting a good screenshot...



I'm using Playwright right now, migrating horrendous Selenium tests at work and it's a real breeze of fresh air. It just works, it comes battery included with superb debugging tools (step by step execution directly in the browser, trace dumping for further analysis, reliable interactions recorder with pretty decent code generation ...).

It's an amazing piece of software for a domain that was kept on the side of the road for years.

If you already tried Cypress, then it's Cypress but with true multiple browser support, available in 4 languages, without the bloat and a cleaner and more idiomatic API.


Is it less flaky than Cypress? We're constantly running into Cypress bugs, when we find a workaround for one, two more show up.


In my experience yes. We ran into a Cypress bug that was bad enough that we just switched to Playwright and it works great.


As others mentioned, the same guy is involved in Playwright. One thing I wanted to mention is that he is extremely responsive. I posted several issues a number of years ago and he fixed them pronto. And even dug into the underlying Chromium issues.


Yeah he’s good. Helped me with an issue I had. The particular issue I have is actually in puppeteer. But I need a .net library so that’s why I mentioned it.

Not trying to downplay his project cos it’s actually really good.


you need to put this before the Screenshot ?

await page.WaitForLoadStateAsync(LoadState.NetworkIdle);


I’ll give it a go thanks.


Same guy does playwright sharp, he should really have more supporters


OH WOW! I had no idea! Yeah he does deserve more support. I still donno why MS can't contribute to projects directly. But I'm happy there's another possible solution to my problem.


.NET Foundation is where a lot of the contribution back to the community happens, I believe.


Have you tried selinium and phantomjs headless ? I was using that a few years ago and it worked very well.


PhtantomJS was abandoned officially a long time ago because of all these new and better tools.

Selenium is a source of constant bugs and misery - it's truly a waste of time maintaining its usage in a codebase because randomly sometimes tests fail. The C# wrapper for it is even worse, as it does not follow the idioms of C# and is a straight 1:1 port from the Java version. Highlights include getting exceptions from properties when you hover over them during debug in Visual Studio.


it reflects my experience

rerunning tests because always a few of them fail on first run

but I noticed that the biggest reason was that often my browser was a little ahead when it comes to version than engine, and after updating both of them the situation was a kinda better.

Anyway I don't recommend Selenium, it wastes too much time


Selenium is still very flaky. We have almost zero problems with playwright except where we made the mistake. On the other hand, we get all sorts of weird glitches with Selenium and often have to re-run tests for them to pass with no other changes.


I have built selenium test harnesses using webdriverjs and Jest as the runner at my two most recent jobs. Been using the webdriverjs 4 alpha which has/had been in progress forever. I've never had a flakey-ness issue that was the fault of selenium.

I don't understand why it doesn't get more love and support. You can build higher level testing frameworks right on top of it.


I couldn't get it working in an AWS Lambda. May work now but I haven't had time this year to re-visit that project.


Assuming those run a container? With puppeteer on Heroku, I had to install chrome as part of the container, then pass it no-sandbox on startup. I'd guess you'd need something similar with chrome (I'm on mobile, so excuse the formatting):

  #Install Chrome for Puppeteer: 
  RUN curl -LO https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb
  RUN apt-get update -y
  RUN apt-get install -y ./google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb
  RUN rm google-chrome-stable_current_amd64.deb 
  ENV PUPPETEER_SKIP_CHROMIUM_DOWNLOAD=true
  ENV PUPPETEER_EXECUTABLE_PATH=/usr/bin/google-chrome-stable

  browser = await Puppeteer.LaunchAsync(
                        new LaunchOptions {
                            //If we're debugging, then open actual chrome:
                            Headless = !Debugger.IsAttached,
                            Args = new string[] {
                            "--no-sandbox"
                        },
                        });


I can run puppeteer in a Lambda fine, it's just that when you navigate to a webpage with a background loaded as a css image it doesn't wait for that to load before taking the screen grab. :(

https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/issues/4046


Could be the same reason why this doesn't work as an Azure Function either:

https://github.com/microsoft/playwright-dotnet/issues/1076




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: