Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're assuming the truth of one side in the matter, with very limited information.


This is the umpteenth time I've seen this "But we don't know anything about it!" argument, and besides surprising me it's beginning to piss me off. We know quite a bit. Why do people keep claiming we don't -- just too lazy to read the thread where this stuff is repeatedly linked, or trying to promote some agenda?

https://twitter.com/SarahBelleLin/status/1370071520953835520

https://archive.is/Z55Oe


not that big of an assumption given that, as we have seen, the person in question had no reason to make that up and a lot to lose.


People have all sorts of reasons to air dirty laundry; publicity, for one. Assuming you know the whole story based on the retelling of one side in a tweet is a mistake.


There were reply tweets from the other guy in literally the same Twitter thread, so what "retelling of one side" are you talking about?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: