My position is that both sides have a burden of proof. It is incorrect to place that burden on only one side. There is no consensus on the validity of the claims of crypto proponents. I don't see either side meeting a burden of proof.
Sorry, I'm a bit lost here. I'm talking about the claims of the OP here. Their claims in the Twitter thread are specific and they haven't provided any proof for them.
I'm unsure what claims you're alluding to. But I'd love to help out as much as I can.
