Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That sounds like a burden of proof shift. Why should that be illegal in the first place?


Because it's used to launder money for crime, destroy the environment, and supports the cringiest, most juvenile libertarian derp (thanks Krugman!) about freedom from the tyranny of money banking government taxes or whatever.


Well, as Rothbardian I think that would be an acceptable cost even if it were empirically true enough to matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: