Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This isn't a case of planned obsolescence. If anything it's exactly the opposite of that, trying to prolong the useful life of a phone as its battery degrades. This did of course lead to them offering a $29 battery replacement for affected phones (after they were caught doing this).

The lack of communication was a problem but "planned obsolescence" in this case is just tin-foil hat nonsense.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: