Uh-oh, this is sooo important, some title on the Internet is wrong!
If I read it correctly, the same app, compiled from the same code, for the same OS, but different CPU architectures, exhibits wildly different memory consumption for the same task. That's what's interesting here, at least to me, but you chose to nitpick on the title instead, just because - from what you write - it offended you somehow by not including the word "editing" at the beginning.
I mean, sure, go on, have fun, but at least don't expect your posts not be downvoted.
No one said there isn't a bug, but not about the gif, it's about editing the gif.
This title is like saying a guy killed 10 people with a pen, and it turns out he signed an order for their execution.
It's a bug, but nowhere near what the title implies.
-
Edit: No it's not about the gif, just like it's not about the pen even if it was involved.
The editor completely changes things and makes the gif the least interesting part.