Far from it. That old power station will sit idle for a long, long time... unless they build a solar farm around it.
Seriously, there will never, ever be one solitary erg of commercially competitive energy from any process dependent on heating by neutron irradiation. Every cent going into work on those is, in effect, stolen from work on viable technologies that can have any impact on global climate disruption—mainly solar, wind, geothermal, and storage; and digs fusion deeper into an already tens-of-$billions-deep hole it can never climb out of.
The only reasons spending on neutronic fusion continues are secondary—employing hot-neutron physicists so enough are ready when weapons work comes up, hi-temp superconductor industrialization, plasma fluid dynamics praxis, hot-neutron-tolerant metallurgy.
At the end of it all they will shrug and say, "We guessed wrong", and not even apologize; instead: "... but we have this other great idea!"
Seriously, there will never, ever be one solitary erg of commercially competitive energy from any process dependent on heating by neutron irradiation. Every cent going into work on those is, in effect, stolen from work on viable technologies that can have any impact on global climate disruption—mainly solar, wind, geothermal, and storage; and digs fusion deeper into an already tens-of-$billions-deep hole it can never climb out of.
The only reasons spending on neutronic fusion continues are secondary—employing hot-neutron physicists so enough are ready when weapons work comes up, hi-temp superconductor industrialization, plasma fluid dynamics praxis, hot-neutron-tolerant metallurgy.
At the end of it all they will shrug and say, "We guessed wrong", and not even apologize; instead: "... but we have this other great idea!"