Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Fair, I just don't see how my acquiescence to one thing is an endorsement of a distinct, if similar, thing.

I guess I reject the idea that policy (a well considered and debated, long lasting decision) would actually fall for something like a slippery slope.

The proverbial boiled frog just jumps out of the pot when the water gets too hot, in reality.




I appreciate that, and for what it's worth I agree you that slippery slope/establishing a precedent is countered with concrete and well thought out criteria that need to be met.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: