Today Scotland passed the wildly controversial hate crime bill. Thankfully the bill was amended several times which gutted many of the more extreme provisions. But I can tell you for a fact that people I know have been seriously preparing to go underground - they perceived this bill as such a serious threat to their freedom of speech and religious liberty that some where preparing to purchase property in remote locations to enable clandestine meetings, others started reading on encryption, etc.
Not one said “oh well, time to change my basic wordlview, since it might soon be illegal”.
I don’t think passing a law intends to change individual peoples’ worldview. I wasn’t able to find an article with a my example of things that would be prosecuted after the bill was passed that could be controversial, only hand-wavey claims.
Not one said “oh well, time to change my basic wordlview, since it might soon be illegal”.