Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We fix bugs we didn't know about as soon as they're reported. To assert malice not stupidity needs more evidence, or else it's just based on your ill will. ICYMI, thread:

https://twitter.com/BrendanEich/status/1367161348166017024




If it were a bug then why say it is fine? I'm not saying it wasn't but normally I don't see people calling something a bug and at the same time defending it?


The only defense from me was for refcoded keywords (all browsers do this).


As someone new to Brave, threads like this only increase my trust in Brave. Any comment negative about Brave is voted up here on HN, any comment in favour of it is voted down, and as soon as someone asks for evidence of Brave's negative behaviour, they backtrack and shift to a different argument or share something flimsy and intentionally misportrayed. At this point I'm not sure if it's intentional FUD or just some people's knee-jerk reaction to anything crypto-related (along with political biases), but I've learnt that criticism of Brave should never be taken at face value here.


Yes listening to the CEO who earn money from good pr is smarter than listening to smart people on HN. Try that life philosophy out elsewhere too.


Should we not fix bugs? As for “smart people”, if you are flattering yourself, give it a rest. I just replied to your misguided comment that we should switch engines and go out of business to fight Chromium monoculture. Not smart!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: