Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For whatever reason, this never bothered me. The service wasn't any worse for it, I didn't really feel taken advantage of... technically they were part of how I might have gotten to one of those links.

I guess there's the loss in privacy where it's known what browser I use, but that's not the kind of privacy loss that worries me.

They've got to pay the bills somehow, and while they should have been more up-front about doing it this way, and it is a breach of trust, it still landed in the realm of "reasonable asking for forgiveness" to me.

> I don't trust their promises.

Maybe I'm just not seeing which promise it was that was broken so badly.



> Maybe I'm just not seeing which promise it was that was broken so badly.

The unspoken promise that web browsers should be impartial user agents that render the content as its authors intended, rather than man-in-the-middle agents that modify the content as they see fit.

The fact this change also benefitted Brave authors directly is an additional breach of trust.

Inexcusable in my opinion, and with the other shady cryptocurrency dealings mentioned in a sibling comment, it's enough for me to never want to use their browser or anything associated with them.

I appreciate they're trying to change the status quo of how the web works and is monetized today, but they started on the wrong foot and their reputation is forever tarnished in my eyes.


- It alters the content that is served to you. It violates the expectation that your browser is a neutral agent.

- It monetises the content created by other people. As someone who lives off the content I create, I'd take offence to that, particularly if it changes already monetised links.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: