Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are talking about a solution that might work[0]. But the issue is not that this solution has not been tried, rather no solutions are being tried because the police simply refuse to allow any potential solutions.

Most workers in the US are not protected by unions, the police are a stark exception to this. Their union contracts not only protect them as workers, they ensure protections that people absolutely would not believe, such as mandatory cooling off periods before police can be interviewed when charged with misconduct.

Even if the rules were nearly even for police and non-police the issue remains that most enforcement would have to come from their peers (other police or DAs, even other enforcement officers at state and federal agencies will see themselves on the same team). They don’t want to subject one of their own to the criminal justice system because they know how cruel and damaging it is.

[0] It actually won’t work though:

- Taxpayers with police forces that actually avoid incidents that would pay out will still have to pay the insurance tax

- Incidents of gross civil rights violations (such as intentionally arresting or killing someone when it was not warranted) are so injurious that nobody will insure the police forces that actually need it

- In the interim we may see one of the worst possible outcomes: a police understanding that violations are simply a dollars and cents issue



It’s clear police and their supporting systems don’t want to change.

Dumb question—what about introducing a competing agency or agencies?

How bad of an idea is a “for profit police force?”




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: