Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why assume they'd only want to distort prices up rather than down?

On the contrary, it seems to me that "banning selling, not buying" could be a useful tool for helping out some hypothetical buddies who would rather that a large tranche of 115s & 320s don't end up very inconveniently in the money.



Why would they think about helping “some buddies” first when their house was on fire and about to collapse?

Don’t you realize how extreme it was for them to have to borrow $1B in a single day?


> Why would they think about helping “some buddies” first when their house was on fire and about to collapse?

I wouldn't call it their house. I would call it partially /their/ house and partially a house owned by "some buddies."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: